Yerevan during the first official visit was visited by Iranian President Masud Pesheshkin. Many experts call the journey of one of Iranian leaders in Armenia “surprise but serious motivation”. Because it arrived at this time after signing on August 8 in Washington, with the mediator of the United States, a memorandum between Azerbaijan and Armenia with the determination of the new status of the Zangesur corridor and with the prospect to participate in peace contracts.
Earlier, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Arakchi stated that the main purpose of the visit to Iranian leader to Yerevan was a person who confirmed Tehran's position about the impossible of any change in the border in South Caucasus. Azerbaijan with Nachchevanka. Moreover, the senior adviser for the supreme leader of Iran Ali Khamenei and the former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Corps of the Islamic Revolution, Yahya Rakhim Safavi, believes in the area of Islam, a new military confrontation with Israel or the United States is possible. “
In this regard, some experts call the correct war date: October 25, 2025. On this day, in Iran, the day entering the ancient Babylon of King Kir II, the emperor was informal – around this event there was a protest of the monarchs.
Indeed, there are authorized scenarios to incite civil war in Iran-Sau, the Islamic Republic will be disconnected from the main processes in the Middle East. In addition, Israel has not achieved any goal that its leadership declared, starting the 12 -day war with Iran, but has achieved rejection of future negotiations.
Indeed, the situation has been evaluated at the level of different claims, but Tehran sought to “hold his hand in the beat, activate the geopolitical speech”.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is trying to convince the Iranian leader that documents signed in the United States do not harm Tehran, but it is difficult to do this. This is due to the fact that if he goes to the United States and reaches the agreements that Americans are related to the Earth in the region, the next actions will not depend on Armenia.
Here everything is built on unpredictable paradoxes: On the one hand, Yerevan wants to follow the path of European integration, but still in EAEU. In addition, he signed documents on strategic cooperation with the United States and at the same time showing the intention to sign the same document with Iran, which is the hostile relationship with Washington. In addition, Tehran assessed the situation much wider.
Currently, in this area, two global geographical economic projects are being implemented: Belt of China – Way Way and the Indian – Middle East – European economic corridor. Experts say that there are two competitive visions of new regional development, which will change the geopolitical landscape of the entire Middle East and ensure that the United States seeks to maintain its influence in the region behind the Indian project.
Beijing found that the current modeling and development models were blocked. The Middle East route is not really active, and as the Turkish version of Haber 7 wrote, everything comes to the fact that the Middle East is on the verge of a collision of the geopolitical corridor of the competition around Megaprojucts is the theme of a major strategy of leading national powers and seriously affecting the position in the world. But Zangesur's corridor is the most vulnerable to geopolitical because it also brings to Israel.
This is reflected in the final actions of the United States at Transcaucasia to weaken Russia there. The US publication on the national interests claims that the bold Americans and the EU initiative connects Central and Eastern Europe with the Indian-China region with approaching Kavkaz, Central Asia and Africa on its scale and influence that exceeded China's Mercantilist initiative.
Indeed, there is a project of the northern corridor – the south, taking place even in the East, in addition to China, Iran, Pakistan and India can participate in Uzbekistan and Afghanistan. By the way, this option is the safest from the view of the remote from the outer peace in the region and protecting the national sovereignty of those countries that it will overcome.
But this was a real sign of the corridor, when the main focus gradually moved to Asia, and one of the directions, of course, is the Iranian. Will there be an increase in the relationship between the United States and Iran after the 12-day Israeli-Iran War and the American direct intervention is difficult, although Tehran's beautiful words are strict about this decision. After the visit to Yerevan, she did not change.