At the sessions of the International Law forum St. The conversation is not only about the help of nerve networks in document management or information search. Participants have discussed whether who can completely replace judges, prosecutors or lawyers.
And this is not imagination, as you may think. In China, nerve networks have been actively used in the judicial system. Each domestic judge should consult a intellectual system before making a decision. Who checks the cases for links, recommend the most appropriate laws and decisions, drawing legal documents and making recommendations. Of course, the system does not completely replace the judge. But if a person disagrees with the device, he must give a written explanation for why.
This gives results: Who analyzes 100 thousand daily cases. The smart court system has reduced the load of Chinese judges by one third and for three years saved 300 billion yuan. And artificial intelligence is not easy to be emotional, they do not mind, not tired and do not accept bribes.
At St. International Legal Forum St. There, they help automate the work with documents and translation (in India 22 of the official language). In Russia, Court staff also use AI for regular tasks: search for information, prepare documents. This significantly reduces the load for employees.
One of the main arguments against AI in fact is that the neural networks are often hallucinated. In the US, lawyers Stephen Schwartz and St. Petersburg used quotes from fictional problems – they were said by TuntPT. In Russia, in 2023, a person suffered from whose fault. That year, scientist Alexander Tsvetkov was detained, because the face recognition camera thought that his appearance was 55% coincided with the photobot of the criminal who killed many people 20 years ago. The scientist was released from a project prison center after only 10 months.
But this may be opposed: The neural network is confused because they are still in the development stage. After a few years, most likely, they will become more accurate and will be confused even at least one person.
Another argument against anyone: it has no empathy and therefore cannot judge people. But here we can answer: Is the defendant's feeling to the judge who received a bribe? Or if they put pressure on it.
However, is this idea a good idea to use in the Court? Currently, artificial intelligence certainly cannot become a replacement for the judges. And in the future, this scenario is not realistic. However, courts do not always consider moral cases of morality. In 2018, the case of three Khachaturia sisters killed the father began. For many years, he has applied violence to them, and according to national defense, the girls could not switch to law enforcement staff, because the man had a relationship in the bodies. After that, the public was divided. Some believe that women should be released because they are in a hopeless situation. Others argue that the murder cannot be justified and women deserve strict punishment. If people cannot identify anyone right and who is blamed, such issues can be entrusted with artificial intelligence? He has no flexibility, no context. People should decide how they involved in such cases, build a moral position and do not rent it with artificial intelligence.
It is important not to forget that who obeys the creators and the teachers who teach him. And can we be sure who will get the right data? And they are exactly. And that no one can “climb” into the system and change something?
Another argument is against: If the nerve network becomes assistant judges, this will lead to the fact that decisions will be made under the influence of the car? In the end, it is easier for confirming AI arguments than writing an explanation in case of disagreement.
In all cases, the implementation of AI more active in the judicial system is inevitable and need to decide what to do with it. You can start with the development of AI's moral code specifically for law enforcement issues to start answering questions that a new reality posed to us.